﻿ Intermittent Photon Exchange ﻿ ﻿
READ THIS FIRST ---> one inch equation: TL = mc^2

Flux Particle Theory
by James Cranwell
http://www.mccelt.com/

Everything in the Universe is made from one type of thread.
All workings of the Universe are result from said thread.

The particle itself would be just the grey threads (or strings) in the picture (no color and a lot thinner of course).
It would fit perfectly inside of a dodecahedron.
Actual thread (or string) length is about one Ångström and it is fine enough where 10 threads (20 radii) could curl-up into the size of a neutron.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Intermittent Photon Exchange
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

If you were holding a rope and I was holding the other end... we are connected.

` ●~~~~~~~~~~●`

If you have a rope and so do I and we exchange ropes: nothing is connected and we will fly apart.

` ● ~~~~~   ~~~~~ ●`

Someone must have realized if electrons are connected to the nucleus the connections will interfere with other connections. Like if you have a bunch of balloons on a windy day - the ribbons will all tangle up. The same thing will happen with multiple electron connections.
You could have one electron connected to a proton and the whole package could revolve as a whole.

` ●●≈≈≈≈≈∗~~~~~ `

If you have a large number of electrons that still might work for one atom if the whole things was revolving as a whole but then there would be absolutely no way for atoms to attach to other atoms. It would amount to something like spinning spheres. And if you have two things that are spinning or revolving you would need axles or universal joints for them to connect and stay connected.
That means electrons orbiting / revolving around a stationary nucleus will not work and electrons revolving with the nucleus as a whole will not work - they are impossible models.

So they came up with the intermittent photon exchange, where the electron connections can actually pass through one another. This is achieved by the protons (actually quarks) shooting photons at the electrons.
As the electron goes round the nucleus - the quark that is doing the shooting at that particular electron must be changing. And the photons must be getting shot right through the center of the nucleus if the electron is on the other side at the moment.

` ∗ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ●●● ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ∗ `

The quark on the left side (above) is shooting at the electron on the left side. What happens when that electron orbits over to the right side? Imagine this with about 80 protons and neutrons, 160 n/p ...three times that amount in quarks, that makes 480 quarks.
It is another impossibility but everyone believes it.

They call the concept a "force carrier" and they might say something like "photons are mediating the electromagnetic force between protons and electrons." That's what would be holding electrons in their orbits - photons are being shot at them

` ● ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ∗ `

The sad thing is they also used this concept for everything else. They think protons are held together by quarks shooting gluons at other quarks. And the real crazy one is gravitons - they think gravitons are mass-less particles and they are traveling back and forth between matter at the speed of light.

So I guess the Moon is being held in place by gravitons being shot at it from the Earth. That sounds correct - doesn't it?

Why did this happen? That's easy... the electron model is wrong and all of the stuff they explain is like a patch for it.

` ●●≈≈≈≈≈∗~~~~~ `

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thread Network Connections
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The thread network is gravitational centered and moves with the largest mass in proximity.

With large size regular matter the story changes.
The threads can disconnect and reconnect extremely fast (this might also be because we cannot tell the true speed things are happening. Everything might be happening very slowly but we see things at the speed we see things. It is like being in a movie and you cannot tell the speed the projector is running because you are in the movie)

● With regular matter: there would be billions of connections between the masses.
So, even if the connections were constantly reconfiguring by disconnecting / reconnecting: there would be so many that they of course would never all be in the same disconnected state where everything could be loose and fly apart.

● Inside an atom that is NOT the case. There, there would be only one connection (from proton (quark) to electron). If it is even momentarily disconnected the electron would be on the loose.

Also, anywhere there is mass: there must be an excess of threads. That is what they claim dark matter would be.
If you run your hand through water - it stays completely surrounded by water. The same thing is happening with the thread network but it would be even easier to accomplice.

Water would be creating a solid pack around you.
The thread network packs space by commandeering an area (volume) but it is still almost empty.
The trick might be to have an abundance of loose threads floating around ready to fill in gaps, tears anything needed to be filled.
If there were a huge 3-D spiders web commandeering a volume there could also be billions of other threads just floating around in the same area.

There isn't anyway to logically figure it out except that there must be an excess of threads because: if there were only the exact amount of threads to make the thread network - no matter would have been able to form.

Matter uses space (thread network threads) to form...
http://www.mccelt.com/quantum-boom-theory.php#created

_________________________________________

References
[3] Flux Particle Theory & Why the Speed of Light is "C"
http://vixra.org/abs/1510.0103
Authors: Seamus McCelt
Category: Quantum Gravity and String Theory

## Add a Comment

 Font Size A A A A A A A Font Family t v g a s m r Translate The particle itself would be just the grey threads in the picture (no color and a lot thinner of course). It would fit perfectly inside of a dodecahedron. Actual thread (or string) length is about one Ångström and it is fine enough where 10 threads (20 radii) could curl-up into the size of a neutron.

﻿
quantum thread theory quantum boom theory the one inch equation quantum gravity thunderbolt & lightning cosmic thread dipole repeller einstein did not say that einsteins light clock electrons are fixed position emergence gravitational constant gravitational waves gravitons & spacetime get ruled out gravity killed the dinosaurs instantaneous freeze everything can be correct with math orbital intersection theory quantum thread math Rainbows separate light and dark NO EXPANSION - NO DARK ENERGY - NO SINGULARITIES the ghost in the machine The Shape of Water time time is emergent You are 3-D but really 1-D but really 3-D black holes mighty jets why the speed of light is c

Note: As always - if you steal my original ideas - I will come to your house.

The McCelt Tartan