the-one-inch-equation-to-explain-all-physical-laws
Flux Particle Theory
by James Cranwell
http://www.mccelt.com/


 
Everything in the Universe is made from one type of particle.
All workings of the Universe are result from said particle.

THE GHOST IN THE MACHINE
The particle itself would be just the grey strings in the picture (no color and a lot thinner of course).
It would fit perfectly inside of a dodecahedron.
Actual string length is about one Ångström and it is fine enough were 10 strings (20 radii) could curl-up into the size of a neutron.

If you think you can explain a ghost... that's great.
If you think you can debunk a ghost... that's great.

But if you explain or debunk with stuff like:
It's white,
it's fluffy,
it passes through walls,
it's scary,
it floats.

Everyone will still be in the dark about what a ghost is.

Nothing was explained or debunked... you didn't explain what a ghost is, you didn't debunk what it is or is not and you do not know for sure if there actually are ghosts.

Make sure your explanation or debunk really is an explanation or debunk.
Or you are only doing the equivalent of calling a ghost...

"Spooky Action at a Distance"

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

NOTE: the ghost was only an explanation / analogy.
The same holds true for anything (like an electron) and that is the purpose of writing.
The explanations given for an electron (and most other things in modern physics) are NOT actually explanations.
Most things are (actually not) explained with words like forces, fields and charge because those things (forces, fields, charge, etc,) are NOT explained. Can you explain what a force is? No you cannot.

How about a charged force field?
You can probably get a good picture of what you think that is in your mind but nothing about it is explained in any way, shape or form.

A lot of things are supposedly explained by different particles. That must mean they have different shapes, functionality and inner workings. That is NOT actually too feasible. I'd say it is impossible.


_________________________________________

References
[3] Flux Particle Theory & Why the Speed of Light is "C"
  http://vixra.org/abs/1510.0103
  Authors: Seamus McCelt
  Category: Quantum Gravity and String Theory


Add a Comment

Font Size A A A A A A A
Font Family t v g a s m r
  Translate
The particle itself would be just the grey strings in the picture (no color and a lot thinner of course).
It would fit perfectly inside of a dodecahedron.
Actual string length is about one Ångström and it is fine enough were 10 strings (20 radii) could curl-up into the size of a neutron.


the-one-inch-equation-to-explain-all-physical-laws blunders CMB continuously-discrete deutsch dipole-repeller einstein-did-not-say-that einsteins-light-clock emergence francais gravitational-warpage how-energy-actually-works inadvertently-correct index intermittent-photon-exchange italiano math matter-cannot-be-fat quantum-thread-math quarks russian NO SPATIAL EXPANSION -- NO DARK ENERGY -- NO SINGULARITIES svenska stationary-ether-and-magnetic-fields the-ghost-in-the-machine time truth what-is-energy what-powers-a-black-holes-mighty-jets why-the-speed-of-light-is-c


The McCelt Tartan