READ THIS FIRST ---> one inch equation: TL = mc^2

Flux Particle Theory
by James Cranwell

Everything in the Universe is made from one type of thread.
All workings of the Universe are result from said thread.


The quantum thread itself would be just the grey threads (or strings) in the picture (no color and a lot thinner of course).
It would fit perfectly inside of a dodecahedron.
Actual quantum thread (or string) length is about one Ångström and it is fine enough where 10 threads (20 radii) could curl-up into the size of a neutron.

If you test for a conveyance of light... you would test if there is one, correct?

Michelson-Morley did NOT do that, they tested if the Earth was rushing through an Ether (medium), that is an erroneous constraint and a big mistake.

Then everyone completely loses all sensibility and accepts the experiment as valid.

That means (they think) light does not have a quantum thread network it travels in and since it cannot be just a pure vibration or energy (since there are no such things) they have to invent a mass-less particle. That is compounding the mistake and it is 2 levels deep at the moment.

But everyone knows matter does have mass (a substance).

But this supposed massless particle does not. So, to explain it they come up with an Higgs field that is completely filling space (in the same way an ether would) and that is what is giving mass only to certain particles. Now the mistake is 3 levels deep.

NOTE: The Higgs field would actually be a particle network. They think they found the Higgs by smashing protons together and getting the mass-energy?
That is guess work. I have something the weighs 2 grams, what is it?

The funny thing is they think photons are massless particles.
Think about how many there would be.
Space would be almost solid with massless particles all zipping around in every possible direction at the speed of light. That would mean space is actually filled with particles. And space is also filled with the Higgs particles.

So, what happened is they thought they eliminated the one particle network that explained how light travels (the ether, medium) and now to explain light they need at least 2 particle networks.

Einstein knew there was an ether but he went along with them because he knew they were all imbeciles, it's actually really easy to see that.


THINK ABOUT IT AGAIN: If there are massless particle photons, space is actually filled solid with them and they are zipping around at the speed of light.

NOTE: A field actually has to be something, i.e. a quantum thread network. It is NOT pure magic or nothing like a mainstream definition. "Filled solid" does not mean literally solid. Everyone knows nothing is actually solid, atoms are mostly empty space


There is a quantum thread network made of individual yet connected threads completely filling space.
The thread network is NOT fixed in space, it moves-along-with / is-held-in-place-by the largest mass in proximity.
It's something like the way gravity works, relative strength due to size and proximity.
It's all made from the same quantum threads.

Part of the thread network is surrounding and moving with you.
You are completely immersed in the Earths thread network.
The Earth thread network moves with the Earth and is inside of the Suns thread network.
The Suns thread network encompasses the entire solar system (plus more) and moves with the Sun.
A Galaxy of course has a thread network and it moves with the Galaxy (as a whole and with the movement of individual stars and systems).

So if there is a galaxy shooting through the Universe at high speed, the thread network it contains is of course traveling with it. If it collides with another galaxy the threads will of course interact. The stars can shoot right by each other but the quantum thread network(s) are completely filling space so they would collide, bunch up and some threads stay put (they cannot keep moving with the galaxy, there is already another thread network in that direction.).
It's the same thread network but two groups are forced together (like tectonic plates)

The galaxies would still have their thread networks (what they think dark matter is) even after the collision. But where the galaxies collided there would be a clump (enough quantum threads for 2 thread networks smooshed into the area of one) and it will take a long time to normalize (smooth back out) .

What they call "Dark Matter" is completely filling space - it's a quantum thread network. The clumps around galaxies and other spots are excessive amounts.


There is at least one quantum thread network in space, correct?
Even an imbecile will agree there is at least one thread network in space.
The thread network must be made out of threads.

If you took a size 4 chunk (volume) of the quantum thread network in space (that would be 4 groups of threads) and used the 4 thread groups to make regular matter (something like hydrogen gas, that's 2 balled up protons and 2 electrons wrapped around the protons) it would occupy a size 1 chunk,. and that comes out to be about 25%.

4 units of space equals 1 unit of real / normal matter.

Space has all threads expanded to full size.
Matter has the threads balled-up and or wrapped around the nucleus.

That means the quantum thread network in space is the equivalent of 25% real matter, but since it is actually just the thread network that you cannot see, I guess you can call it Dark Matter.

Got it? If you think of all the threads in space that are filling the Universe and convert them into normal matter... you would get a Universe that is filled with 25% matter.

Regardless of the theory something like this must be true.


[3] Flux Particle Theory & Why the Speed of Light is "C"
  Authors: Seamus McCelt
  Category: Quantum Gravity and String Theory

Add a Comment

Font Size A A A A A A A
Font Family t v g a s m r
1 .2 .3 .5 .7 2
The particle itself would be just the grey threads in the picture (no color and a lot thinner of course).
It would fit perfectly inside of a dodecahedron.
Actual thread length is about one Ångström and it is fine enough where 10 threads (20 radii) could curl-up into the size of a neutron.

big burst quantum boom theory the one inch equation quantum gravity gravitation without mass - the curve ball blunders CMB universe equation thunderbolt & lightning dark energy and dark matter magnetic compass cosmic thread dipole repeller einstein did not say that einsteins light clock electrons are fixed position emergence gravitational warpage gravitational waves gravitons & spacetime get ruled out gravity killed the dinosaurs how energy actually works index instantaneous freeze intermittent photon exchange everything can be correct with math matter cannot be fat matter is created from space orbital intersection theory Reconciliation of Gravity and Quantum Mechanics quantum thread math quarks Rainbows separate light and dark Reconciliation of Newton - Tesla - GR - QM NO EXPANSION - NO DARK ENERGY - NO SINGULARITIES stationary ether and magnetic fields the ghost in the machine The Shape of Water time time is emergent You are 3-D but really 1-D but really 3-D what is energy black holes mighty jets why the speed of light is c

Note: As always - if you steal my original ideas - I will come to your house.

The McCelt Tartan