Quantum Thread Theory

by James Cranwell

http://www.mccelt.com/

Reconciliation of Newton's Gravitational Force,

Tesla, General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics

**~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
**

Newton, Tesla, Einstein, Heisenberg

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Reconciliation of Newton's Gravitational Force, Tesla, General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics

● Gravity is based on thread particle network tension -- that's a force.

Here is a regular thread tension formula...

Tension = velocity squared x mass / Length

If we plug in c and rearrange we get the one-inch formula...

TL = mc^2

NOTE: The speed vibrations travel through the network is c and that is also what light and energy are -- just vibrations traveling though a thread particle network.

● Now we know where energy comes from and why light travels at c.

Tesla was correct...

"There is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment." – Nikola Tesla

● The particle network is of course curved around spherical mass.

Is gravity curving the particle network? No! The particle network itself is what creates gravity (gravity is network tension).

Does this invalidate any of Einsteins equations? Of course not, it is just another way to look at it. Einstein has field equations and this is the field (thread particle network).

● Electrons form a thread mesh-type cage around the nucleus. Electrons actually are something but everyone mistakenly thinks the vibration travelling around the thread is the electron -- that's what has caused all the confusion.

The electron is conveying vibrations but the material it is made from (quantum threads) are NOT moving..

EXAMPLE: Think guitar string -- the string itself would be the electron but everyone thinks the vibration or note is the electron. That is why there is all kinds of probability and uncertainty -- the vibration is traveling around a spherical quantum thread mesh cage -- where exactly is the vibration? No way to know for sure.

Got that? The electron has exact position. The vibration position is of course unknown.

NOTE: Heisenberg would be OK with this. A vibration position is of course uncertain.

So, Yes -- everything is compatible. And now you know how they work.

Here is a regular thread tension formula...

Tension = velocity squared x mass / Length.

If we plug c in and rearrange we get the one-inch formula... TL = mc^2

http://www.mccelt.com/the-one-inch-equation-to-explain-all-physical-laws.php

_________________________________________

**References**

[3] Quantum Thread Theory & Why the Speed of Light is "C"

http://vixra.org/abs/1612.0363

Authors: Seamus McCelt

Category: Quantum Gravity and String Theory

by James Cranwell

http://www.mccelt.com/

Everything in the Universe is made from one type of particle.

All workings of the Universe are result from said particle.

All workings of the Universe are result from said particle.

The particle itself would be just the grey threads (or strings) in the picture (no color and a lot thinner of course).

It would fit perfectly inside of a dodecahedron.

Actual thread (or string) length is about one Ångström and it is fine enough where 10 threads (20 radii) could curl-up into the size of a neutron.

It would fit perfectly inside of a dodecahedron.

Actual thread (or string) length is about one Ångström and it is fine enough where 10 threads (20 radii) could curl-up into the size of a neutron.

Tesla, General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics

Newton, Tesla, Einstein, Heisenberg

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Reconciliation of Newton's Gravitational Force, Tesla, General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics

● Gravity is based on thread particle network tension -- that's a force.

Here is a regular thread tension formula...

Tension = velocity squared x mass / Length

If we plug in c and rearrange we get the one-inch formula...

TL = mc^2

NOTE: The speed vibrations travel through the network is c and that is also what light and energy are -- just vibrations traveling though a thread particle network.

● Now we know where energy comes from and why light travels at c.

Tesla was correct...

"There is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment." – Nikola Tesla

● The particle network is of course curved around spherical mass.

Is gravity curving the particle network? No! The particle network itself is what creates gravity (gravity is network tension).

Does this invalidate any of Einsteins equations? Of course not, it is just another way to look at it. Einstein has field equations and this is the field (thread particle network).

● Electrons form a thread mesh-type cage around the nucleus. Electrons actually are something but everyone mistakenly thinks the vibration travelling around the thread is the electron -- that's what has caused all the confusion.

The electron is conveying vibrations but the material it is made from (quantum threads) are NOT moving..

EXAMPLE: Think guitar string -- the string itself would be the electron but everyone thinks the vibration or note is the electron. That is why there is all kinds of probability and uncertainty -- the vibration is traveling around a spherical quantum thread mesh cage -- where exactly is the vibration? No way to know for sure.

Got that? The electron has exact position. The vibration position is of course unknown.

NOTE: Heisenberg would be OK with this. A vibration position is of course uncertain.

So, Yes -- everything is compatible. And now you know how they work.

Here is a regular thread tension formula...

Tension = velocity squared x mass / Length.

If we plug c in and rearrange we get the one-inch formula... TL = mc^2

http://www.mccelt.com/the-one-inch-equation-to-explain-all-physical-laws.php

_________________________________________

[3] Quantum Thread Theory & Why the Speed of Light is "C"

http://vixra.org/abs/1612.0363

Authors: Seamus McCelt

Category: Quantum Gravity and String Theory

T
r
a
n
s
l
a
t
e
mccelt.pdf |

The particle itself would be just the grey threads in the picture (no color and a lot thinner of course).
It would fit perfectly inside of a dodecahedron. Actual thread length is about one Ångström and it is fine enough where 10 threads (20 radii) could curl-up into the size of a neutron. |

the one inch equation to explain all physical laws
blunders
CMB
continuously discrete
magnetic compass
dipole repeller
einstein did not say that
einsteins light clock
electrons are fixed position
emergence
gravitational warpage
gravitational waves
how energy actually works
inadvertently correct
index
intermittent photon exchange
math
matter cannot be fat
matter is created from non empty space
quantum thread math
quarks
Reconciliation of Newtons Gravitational Force - Tesla - General Relativity - Quantum Mechanics
NO SPATIAL EXPANSION -- NO DARK ENERGY -- NO SINGULARITIES
stationary ether and magnetic fields
the ghost in the machine
time
truth
what is energy
what powers a black holes mighty jets
why the speed of light is c